Developing Argumentative Writing Proficiency in Chinese EFL Classrooms: A Genre-Based Group Writing Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v4i1.36.2025Keywords:
Genre-based approach, group writing, argumentative writing, Chinese EFL learners, Systemic Functional LinguisticsAbstract
This study examines the impact of integrating the genre-based approach with group writing on Chinese EFL university students’ argumentative writing proficiency. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving 60 second-year non-English major university students. The experimental group received genre-based group writing instruction, while the control group followed traditional writing instruction. Pre-test and post-test essays were analyzed using Systemic Functional Linguistics scoring criteria, focusing on ideational, interpersonal, and textual meta-functions. Quantitative data analysis included a paired sample t-test to compare the overall writing proficiency of both groups and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess the experimental group’s improvement across the three meta-functions. The results indicated that while both groups showed progress, the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvement, particularly in ideational and textual meta-functions. These findings suggest that genre-based group writing is an effective pedagogical approach for enhancing argumentative writing proficiency in EFL contexts.
References
Abdelmohsen, M. M. (2023). Improving EFL Learners’ Collaborative Skills Through A Writing Module. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 11(3), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejells.2013/vol11n31026
Alghamdy, R. Z. (2019). EFL learners' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(3), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0903.03
Az-Zhahir, H., Sinar, T. S., & Zein, T. T. (2020). Analysis of textual realization in genre description and explanation by students of Samudra University. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(3), 1813-1825. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.1114
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal, 54(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153
Bećirović, S., Dubravac, V., & Brdarević-Čeljo, A. (2022). Cooperative learning as a pathway to strengthening motivation and improving achievement in an EFL classroom. Sage Open, 12(1), 21582440221078016. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221078016
Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing: a genre-based approach: the report of the DSP Literacy Project, Metropolitan East Region. Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Chen, F., Foley, J., & Xiang, P. (2024). Exploring Changes in University Students’ Persuasive Writings with the SFL-based Genre Instruction, (pp. 1-32). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4678420/v1
Chen, R. (2021). A review of cooperative learning in EFL Classroom. Asian Pendidikan, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v1i1.1.2021
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human relations, 2(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&c Black.
Fadhillah, A. M., & Rahmadina, K. P. (2021). Interpersonal metafunction analysis of a literary response text in tertiary education. Indonesian Journal of Functional Linguistics, 1(2), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijsfl.v1i2.43977
Gebhard, M., & Accurso, K. (2020). Systemic functional linguistics. The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1029-1037.
Gong, C., Tan, C. L., & Chin, C. K. (2018). Scaffolding instruction of Chinese essay writing with assessment as learning. Teaching Chinese Language in Singapore: Efforts and Possibilities, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8860-5_9
Grubor, J. (2020). Beyond teaching English: EFL students’ accounts of learning outcomes in a cooperative class. Naucne publikacije Drzavnog univerziteta u Novom Pazaru Serija B Drustvene & humanisticke nauke, 3(2), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.5937/NPDUNP2002080G
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. (2004). The spoken language corpus: A foundation for grammatical theory. In Advances in corpus linguistics (pp. 9-38). Brill.
Halliday, M. A. (1995). Systemic theory. In Concise history of the language sciences (pp. 272-276). Pergamon.
Hawari, O. M. D. A., Al-Shboul, Y., & Huwari, I. F. (2022). Supervisors' Perspectives on Graduate Students' Problems in Academic Writing. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 545-556.
Herman, H., Rafiek, M., Agustina, T., Saddhono, K., Malabar, S., Saputra, N., & Purba, R. (2023). Exploring the metafunctions to improve EFL learners’ writing ability in the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4(2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v4i2.1195
Hu, N. (2022). Investigating Chinese EFL Learners' Writing Strategies and Emotional Aspects. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 440-468. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1336148
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 16(3), 148-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Jiang, D., & Kalyuga, S. (2022). Learning English as a foreign language writing skills in collaborative settings: a cognitive load perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 932291.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932291
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative learning: What special education teachers need to know. The Pointer, 33(2), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/05544246.1989.9945370
Khaki, M., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2021). Assessing the Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback in Process-Based vs Product-Based Instruction on Learners' Writing. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 21, n36-53. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.21.03
Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2023). Systemic functional linguistics: the perfect match for content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(3), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985
Martin, J. R. (2000). Grammar meets genre: reflections on the'Sydney School'. Arts: The Journal of the Sydney University Arts Association, 22.
Mauludin, L. A. (2020). Joint construction in genre-based writing for students with higher and lower motivation. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 38(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2020.1750965
Moon, J., & Ke, F. (2020). Exploring the relationships among middle school students’ peer interactions, task efficiency, and learning engagement in game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 51(3), 310-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120907940
Nair, S. M., & Sanai, M. (2018). Effects of Utilizing the STAD Method (Cooperative Learning Approach) in Enhancing Students' Descriptive Writing Skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 239-252. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1209965
Nagao, A. (2022). A Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Descriptive Report Writing to Japanese EFL University Students. Tesl-Ej, 26(3), n3. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a13
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
Rahmatirad, M. (2020). A review of socio-cultural theory. Siasat, 5(3), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.33258/siasat.v4i3.66
Sari, D. M. M. (2019). An overview of genre based approach in EFL writing class. Journal of English Education (JournE), 1(1), 31-40.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge university press.
Marius, R. (1991). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Teng, M. F. (2021). The effectiveness of incorporating metacognitive prompts in collaborative writing on academic English writing skills. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 659-673. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3789
Varpio, L., Paradis, E., Uijtdehaage, S., & Young, M. (2020). The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Academic medicine, 95(7), 989-994. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language (Vol. 29). MIT press.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Walton, D. N. (1992). Plausible argument in everyday conversation. SUNY Press.
Yasuda, R. (2022). Fluency development through freewriting and transfer to other more structured tasks. Language Teaching Research, 13621688221084899. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221084899
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL quarterly, 16(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586792
Zhang, T., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Taking stock of a genre-based pedagogy: Sustaining the development of EFL students’ knowledge of the elements in argumentation and writing improvement. Sustainability, 13(21), 11616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111616
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Liu Lin, Nalini Arumugam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
